Close

This page had been redirected to a new URL, please update any bookmarks.

Font Size: A A A

macroblog

« The structure of the structural unemployment question | Main | Taking a deeper dive into the definition of inflation »

April 13, 2012

Is the composition of job growth behind slow income growth?

Harold Meyerson, Washington Post opinion writer, channels a Bloomberg report (via The Big Picture), and thinks he finds a smoking gun:

"Why is this recovery different from all other recoveries?

"... what really sets the current recovery apart from all its predecessors is this: Almost three years after economic growth resumed, the real value of Americans' paychecks is stubbornly still shrinking. According to Friday's Bloomberg Economics Brief, ‘the pace of income gains is well below that of the past two jobless recoveries and real average hourly earnings continue to decline.'

"The Bloomberg report cites one reason for this anomaly: Most of the jobs being created are in low-wage sectors. According to Bloomberg, fully 70 percent of all job gains in the past six months were concentrated in restaurants and hotels, health care and home health care, retail trade, and temporary employment agencies. These four sectors employ just 29 percent of the country's workforce but account for the vast majority of the jobs being created."

Meyerson accurately repeats the Bloomberg story, but that story itself is somewhat misleading. To begin with, the 70 percent figure appears to include the entire category of professional and business services, of which temporary help services are only a part. The types of jobs that fall under the professional and business service label are broadly described by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and include employment in scientific and technical services, management jobs as well as administrative and support type jobs. In particular, the professional scientific and technical services sector is described as follows...

"The Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector comprises establishments that specialize in performing professional, scientific, and technical activities for others. These activities require a high degree of expertise and training. The establishments in this sector specialize according to expertise and provide these services to clients in a variety of industries and, in some cases, to households. Activities performed include: legal advice and representation; accounting, bookkeeping, and payroll services; architectural, engineering, and specialized design services; computer services; consulting services; research services; advertising services; photographic services; translation and interpretation services; veterinary services; and other professional, scientific, and technical services."

... and here is the description of management of companies and enterprises sector:

"The Management of Companies and Enterprises sector comprises (1) establishments that hold the securities of (or other equity interests in) companies and enterprises for the purpose of owning a controlling interest or influencing management decisions or (2) establishments (except government establishments) that administer, oversee, and manage establishments of the company or enterprise and that normally undertake the strategic or organizational planning and decision making role of the company or enterprise. Establishments that administer, oversee, and manage may hold the securities of the company or enterprise."

These parts of the economy are hardly made up of the prototypical low-wage jobs and, according to my calculations, you don't get to Bloomberg's 70 percent number without including them.

If you focus strictly on "restaurants and hotels" (or, more precisely, the leisure and hospitality sector), health care, retail, and temporary employment services, your conclusion would be that these sectors accounted for about 50 percent of total job growth/change over the past six months, a share that may still strike you as pretty significant. But is it really? A little historical context might help:


It is true that this expansion, which began in July 2009, has been unusually concentrated in the four sectors identified by Bloomberg and highlighted in the Meyerson piece. However, a closer look reveals that the only one of the four that looks unusual is employment in temporary help services, the share of which in this recovery has been five times the post-1990 level as a whole. (We reach the same conclusion even if we compare where we are today in this recovery—roughly three years out—with that same period following the recoveries from the 1991 and 2001 recessions.)

On the other hand, it is also true that the share of temp services in total jobs gains has been much lower over the past six months than it was earlier in this recovery. I don't know if that share will eventually fall to the (remarkably stable) level that characterized the (almost) two decades before the past recession. But even if that share remains near 12 percent, as opposed the more historical 6 percent level, I think the story remains the broad-based nature of the relatively tepid growth (in incomes and jobs) that has characterized this recovery.

David AltigBy Dave Altig, executive vice president and research director at the Atlanta Fed

 

April 13, 2012 in Employment, Labor Markets | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c834f53ef0163041c7ff5970d

Listed below are links to blogs that reference Is the composition of job growth behind slow income growth?:

Comments

the bloomberg story notwithstanding, the BLS itself projects that 4 out of 5 of the new jobs in greatest demand this decade will be low paying, low skilled positions that dont even require a high school diploma:

http://bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.nr0.htm

top 5: nurses, retail sales, home health aides, personal care aides, & construction helpers)

Posted by: rjs | April 13, 2012 at 06:58 PM

The immense debt overhang might catch your attention one of these days. This debt is enormously greater, thanks to the great housing boom, than in prior recessions. Debt service sucks at incomes like gas prices, creating no follow-on economic activity. Also relatively unique to this so-called recovery, the absence of meaningful investment. Hard to have a business cycle, much less a recovery, without investment.

Posted by: Demandside | April 30, 2012 at 11:31 PM

Just about ALL sectors are becoming "low wage sectors." Journalism used to pay a professional wage. No more. Construction trades used to be unionized; carpenters in new England made $30 an hour in the early 1990s. Try getting that anywhere now. Nursing home workers were in the mid teens per hour then. They're still getting that now, if they're experienced, 20 years later.

These are low skill jobs? You try coping a new inside cornice on 150-year-old Colonial. Or better yet, bathing a cantankerous 83-year-old man with brittle bones and neuropathy seizing up his legs. Either way, you'll be making about $12 an hour to start. Hope you enjoy the smell of urine!

Posted by: Edward Ericson Jr. | May 02, 2012 at 01:36 PM

Income level isn't increasing in comparison with the Job growth. Many people face many obstacles while managing their family in a better way. This is an alarming for us. Companies and Corporate agency should take a look on this.

Posted by: resume examples | June 25, 2012 at 09:57 AM

It can be concluded now that the lowering of wages is affected by the world economy.

Posted by: John Williams | October 13, 2012 at 10:47 AM

with wages and salary stagnated, consumer's purchasing power also is affected and in return, affects producers in such a way that production and manufacturing also is affected.

Posted by: Jamee Polin | July 28, 2013 at 01:59 AM

Post a comment

Comments are moderated and will not appear until the moderator has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign in