« CPI: The left and the right of it | Main | A funny thing happened on the way to the federal funds market »
June 25, 2009
Private sector forecasts at variance
Economic forecasts are notoriously inaccurate. That isn't a statement about the ability of forecasters, but rather a statement about the complexity of the economy. If you're looking for a humbling experience, I recommend you give it a try.
And today's economy would seem to be an exceptionally difficult environment in which to forecast. As economists peer into the future, there seems to be an unusually wide range of opinion about what to expect. Uncertainty is running pretty high right now in the minds of the top prognosticators.
Consider the following predictions from the Blue Chip panel of economists concerning the economy's growth rate a year and a half from now (fourth quarter 2010). The average growth rate expected in that time frame from the panel is 3 percent, which isn't that different from the six-quarter-ahead forecast they have made every June during the past 10 years or so. But if you compare the difference between the economic optimists (the 10 highest growth forecasts) relative to the economic pessimists (the 10 lowest growth forecasts), the discrepancy between the two views is large relative to recent history. In short, the forecasts on the optimistic end of the spectrum are now more optimistic while the pessimistic forecasts are a little more pessimistic.
Uncertainty over the medium-term outlook is particularly large regarding the experts' views on inflation. In the latest survey of the Blue Chip panel, the difference between the 10 highest and the 10 lowest inflation predictions for the fourth quarter of 2010 was a gaping 3.7 percentage points (compared with an average of about 1.5 percentage points over the past decade and a half). This wide range of opinions about inflation prospects started to emerge last year as economic conditions deteriorated.
Disharmony in the panel's inflation outlook doesn't so much suggest that those expecting inflation now see greater inflationary risks—at 3.2 percent the medium-term inflation prediction of the highest 10 inflation forecasts isn't materially different from where it has been since the late 1990s. Instead, the larger variance in the inflation outlook is coming from those at the bottom of the panel's forecast distribution that are anticipating even more downward price pressure than in previous years.
Pinpointing the future trajectory of the economy is generally considered more difficult near turning points in the business cycle—though the current uncertainty would appear to be particularly large, recession or not. Such uncertainty about the future is surely adding to the challenges facing the business community as it strives to get back on its feet.
By Laurel Graefe, economic research analyst at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
June 25, 2009 in Forecasts, Inflation | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c834f53ef01157158ab6b970b
Listed below are links to blogs that reference Private sector forecasts at variance:
Comments
Posted by:
AllenM |
June 25, 2009 at 03:13 PM
"That isn't a statement about the ability of forecasters, but rather a statement about the complexity of the economy. If you're looking for a humbling experience, I recommend you give it a try"
Just because the rest of the world can't doesn't certify that it's hard.
I figured it out in July 79. It is mathematically impossible to miss an economic forecast (at least out to one year).
Posted by:
flow5 |
June 26, 2009 at 02:37 PM
In spite of all complains about the unpredictability of macroeconomic variables, they can be actually accurately predicted. Unemployment rate in Italy is predicted for the period between 1974 and 2007 with an uncertainty (RMS) of 0.5% at a nine(9!)-year horizon. Essentially, we know now what will be in 2015:
http://seekingalpha.com/instablog/434499-ivan-kitov/10544-unemployment-in-italy-will-reach-11-in-2012
Posted by:
Ivan Kitov |
June 30, 2009 at 08:00 AM
Just a correction. The paper with the prediction of Italian unemployment is published by the Euro Area Business Cycle Network: http://www.eabcn.org/members-research-papers
Posted by:
Ivan Kitov |
June 30, 2009 at 08:22 AM


"Pinpointing the future trajectory of the economy is generally considered more difficult near turning points in the business cycle—though the current uncertainty would appear to be particularly large, recession or not. Such uncertainty about the future is surely adding to the challenges facing the business community as it strives to get back on its feet."
Reading this paragraph made me sigh. I remembered a conversation with Bob Eggert Sr. back in 1988 about why I was interested in studying economics. I was grilling Bob about the lack of concensus during the mid-80s at the critical point of inflection getting us clear of the last economic crisis. He replied that the concensus works best when conditions remain stable for a period of time- long enough for enough of the participants in the study to have some *confidence* in the outlook. At that point I asked him about studying the inflection points and he said that is really the study of political economy, and not true economics.
These divergences occur when paradigms shift. Bob is gone, but I see that clearly now.
Good luck young lady, and may you find a place to use your abilities.
Someday this war's gonna end...