« Great Minds Think Alike | Main | Students, Mark Your Calendar »
March 13, 2007
Foreclosures And Delinquencies: Its All In The ARMs
Here's the news we've been expecting, from CNNMoney:
A record high number of homeowners faced a serious threat of foreclosure during the fourth quarter of 2006, according to a survey released Tuesday by the Mortgage Bankers Association...
Troubled mortgage holders rose across the board: The delinquency rate for one-to-four-family houses rose to 4.95 percent of all loans outstanding compared with 4.67 during the third quarter and 4.70 percent 12 months earlier.
All major loan types contributed to the increase, but subprimes and FHA loans were up the most.
OK, have a look for yourself:
The real (bad) action, of course, is in adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs):
Meanwhile, delinquencies are still growing, though here too the problem is the ARMs:
Calculated Risk has a map with the regional breakdown of delinquency rates, showing the concentration of past due loans in the South and Midwest. Here's more of that story, in pictures:
Once again, the issue is the ARMs:
And foreclosures?
There, unfortunately, you have it.
UPDATE: Much,much more --
Jim Hamilton covers the New Century story. Calculated Risk surveys some "overlooked subprime stories." Daniel Gross is on Contagion Watch. (Here, as well.) Nouriel Roubini reports on a report that emphasizes the non-subprime aspects of the problem. Truck and Barter links to yet more related stories, as does Ben Jones.
Chris Dillow thinks the problem is reall in the labor markets (though Arnold Kling has his doubts about that).
Barry Ritholtz has an explanation of how Collateralized Debt Obigations (CDOs) work.
Claus Vistesen sees "the risk of severe slowdown/recession in the US mounting. Nouriel Roubini says the "credit crunch genie is out of the bottle" --just as Kash feared. Michael Mandel believes that tightening credit standards mean that "an interest rate cut would be in order as well." But James Pethokoukis suggests it may be no more than "March Madness."
March 13, 2007 in Data Releases, Housing | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c834f53ef00d83460afc469e2
Listed below are links to blogs that reference Foreclosures And Delinquencies: Its All In The ARMs:
» Nouriel Roubini: "I Told You So" from EclectEcon
Nouriel Roubini writes about the sub-prime mortgage market meltdown and, with considerable justification, points out that he was warning about this problem long ago.
On my modest side last August, when I started to forecast a recessio... [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 14, 2007 8:09:23 AM
» If you have an ARM from Blown Mortgage
macroblog put together an excellent series of graphs to highlight some of the increased default and foreclosure activity being seen across the country. (hat tip Calculated Risk) Here is one graph of note (see the whole series at macroblog): If [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 14, 2007 11:34:30 AM
Comments
Posted by:
bailey |
March 14, 2007 at 09:35 AM
Is there similar information available on commercial delinquencies and foreclosures?
Posted by:
kharris |
March 14, 2007 at 09:46 AM
May I ask how you get the data? Is it from bloomberg? Thx.
Posted by:
Dave |
March 14, 2007 at 10:33 AM
Would love to see this data going back to the last bust (1990ish)
Posted by:
AD |
March 14, 2007 at 11:11 AM
Dave A. Tim Iacono (please ignore his Blog's title to allow me to make my point) today includes a graph that SCREAMS for a tremendous opportunity missed. http://themessthatgreenspanmade.blogspot.com/2007/03/i-hear-nothing-i-know-nothing.html
Check out Exhibit 4, "Percentage held of Household Mtg. Debt 1971-2006" is the graph. IF the FED had single oversight responsibility over our financial sector it's very unlikely we'd be facing our present prospects.
Posted by:
bailey |
March 14, 2007 at 11:47 AM
How many are (and have been) voicing concern that the subprime mess will spill over to other areas? Are their fears gaining traction?
Certainly Roubini is one, March 15: "[L]ast August, ... I ... argued that this housing bust would soon also lead to serious risks and distress in the financial system. I pointed out that such stress and vulnerabilities would first be noticed in the subprime segment of the mortgage market"
http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/183071
Naked capitalism, March 14: "The much decried New York Time story by Gretchen Morgenson, 'Crisis Looms in Mortgages' doesn't appear as overblown as it did two days ago. The front page of this morning's Financial Times, "Fears of subprime fallout escalate, ..."
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2007/03/tinkerbell-market.html
And then there is Doug Noland, mid-February: "Today, subprime loan exposures have been disbursed throughout our system's financial institutions, securitizations, and derivative markets to an extent never before imagined."
Also rolled up in my Feb. 17 post highlighting Noland are Mike shedlock and Calculated Risk. No doubt both have had more to say on the matter since, as have others among those recently (still?) libeled as permabears:
http://forestpolicy.typepad.com/economics/2007/02/subprime_lendin.html
Posted by:
Dave Iverson |
March 14, 2007 at 12:57 PM
Dave -- The data is from the Mortgage Bankers Association which I obtain via Haver Analytics, a subscription data service.
Kharris: There isn't a comprehensive data set that I know of, but I'll do a little research.
bailey -- Interesting picture, though what you are seeing is primarily theincreasing importance of securitization. I'm not sure broader regulatory reach by the Fed would have changed things that much. My impression is that the beef that people have had with Fannie and Freddie is that they gone too far outside of the traditional mortgage biz, not that they have abosrbed an increasing share of the mortgage debt that exists.
DI -- thanks for the links.
Posted by:
Dave Altig |
March 14, 2007 at 10:21 PM
kharris -- Silly me: http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff/
(Hat tip: Truck and Barter: http://truckandbarter.com/mt/archives/2007/03/subprime.html)
Posted by:
Dave Altig |
March 14, 2007 at 11:34 PM
AD -- Your question is a good one, but the graphs shown have all the data I have available. (There is a longer series on conventional loans only --probably because they completely dominated the market until the late-90s -- but even than series only goes back to 1993.)
Posted by:
Dave Altig |
March 15, 2007 at 07:14 AM
I hate my life and festa
Posted by:
Mikey C |
March 16, 2007 at 02:24 PM
















Not quite. My guess is, MOST ARMs written in our BUBBLE states in '06 & so far into '07, i.e. CA, NV & FL, were "funny money" loans. (These three states have yet to sign on to the CSBS guidelines of 11/14/06.) So, there are MANY ARMs holders out there who are yet to face quite a shock - in the form of prudent reporting rqmts. & credit demands commensurate to the risk they pose.
I don't relish the FED. CA home prices have tripled since '97, obliterating the American dream of home ownership for all but a very few of our young adults. Yet, the pressure's already growing on the FED to ease the pain of recent buyers. http://www.reuters.com/article/email/idUSN135862720070313
Stay tuned, we ain't seen nothing yet.