The Atlanta Fed's macroblog provides commentary and analysis on economic topics including monetary policy, macroeconomic developments, inflation, labor economics, and financial issues.
- BLS Handbook of Methods
- Bureau of Economic Analysis
- Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Congressional Budget Office
- Economic Data - FRED® II, St. Louis Fed
- Office of Management and Budget
- Statistics: Releases and Historical Data, Board of Governors
- U.S. Census Bureau Economic Programs
- White House Economic Statistics Briefing Room
July 20, 2006
The Chairman Speaks: Why Don't Rising Productivity Tides Raise All Boats (Equally)?
Until around 1995, postwar labour productivity grew much faster in Europe than in the United States. But since 1995, Europe’s productivity catch-up ground to a halt and then reversed. The ratio of EU-15 relative to US average labour productivity, using 1995 PPP exchange rates, was 77% in 1979, reached 94% in 1995, and by 2004 had slipped back to 85%. About half of this reversal was from the US surge in productivity growth, which has been much analysed. But the other half of the story, Europe's productivity slowdown, hasn't.
Whad'ya know. It turns out that Chairman Bernanke also had some things to say about this topic yesterday as well (in response to a question from Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed):
I think the primary source of the productivity gains are two.
First is the improvements in information and communication technology we've seen over the last 20 years or so.
But secondly, the United States has done a lot better at using those technologies than a lot of other industrialized countries. And I think that relates to the fact that we do have very flexible product and labor markets, we have deep capital markets that provide funding for new ventures, and we have an economy that has an entrepreneurial spirit. So we made better use of those technological changes than some other countries.
I think that is the primary source of our productivity gains...
There's some very interesting research done by the McKinsey Corporation. It's looked at firms around the world and looks at their productivity gains. And what it finds is that firms that are exposed to competition, as unpleasant as that might feel, they increase their productivity gains much more rapidly.
And so, one of the benefits, I think, of a more open trading system, a more open economy, where we compete with and trade with countries around the world, despite the fact that it does create stress and sometimes changes and dislocations, is that competition forces productivity gains and has been, I think, a source of growth for us as well as for our trading partners.
For what seems like a quite different take on the issue, check out the paper highlighted in The New Economist post linked to above, which claims it is European tax cuts that have slowed their productivity growth. My instinct is to side with some version of the Bernanke explanation. But there is rarely a single factor that provides a fully satisfactory explanation of any particular set of facts, and I haven't read the paper cited by TNE. So I'll leave it as an open question.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to blogs that reference The Chairman Speaks: Why Don't Rising Productivity Tides Raise All Boats (Equally)? :
Tigers, tortoises and textbooks
Until around 1995, postwar labour productivity grew much faster in Europe than in the United States. But since 1995, Europe’s productivity catch-up ground to a halt and then reversed. The ratio of EU-15 relative to US average labour productivity, using... [Read More]
Tracked on Jul 21, 2006 4:04:06 AM
- Does Loyalty Pay Off?
- Immigration and Hispanics' Educational Attainment
- Are Tariff Worries Cutting into Business Investment?
- Improving Labor Market Fortunes for Workers with the Least Schooling
- Part-Time Workers Are Less Likely to Get a Pay Raise
- Learning about an ML-Driven Economy
- Hitting a Cyclical High: The Wage Growth Premium from Changing Jobs
- Thoughts on a Long-Run Monetary Policy Framework, Part 4: Flexible Price-Level Targeting in the Big Picture
- Thoughts on a Long-Run Monetary Policy Framework, Part 3: An Example of Flexible Price-Level Targeting
- Thoughts on a Long-Run Monetary Policy Framework, Part 2: The Principle of Bounded Nominal Uncertainty
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- Business Cycles
- Business Inflation Expectations
- Capital and Investment
- Capital Markets
- Data Releases
- Economic conditions
- Economic Growth and Development
- Exchange Rates and the Dollar
- Fed Funds Futures
- Federal Debt and Deficits
- Federal Reserve and Monetary Policy
- Financial System
- Fiscal Policy
- Health Care
- Inflation Expectations
- Interest Rates
- Labor Markets
- Latin America/South America
- Monetary Policy
- Money Markets
- Real Estate
- Saving, Capital, and Investment
- Small Business
- Social Security
- This, That, and the Other
- Trade Deficit
- Wage Growth