The Atlanta Fed's macroblog provides commentary and analysis on economic topics including monetary policy, macroeconomic developments, inflation, labor economics, and financial issues.
- BLS Handbook of Methods
- Bureau of Economic Analysis
- Bureau of Labor Statistics
- Congressional Budget Office
- Economic Data - FRED® II, St. Louis Fed
- Office of Management and Budget
- Statistics: Releases and Historical Data, Board of Governors
- U.S. Census Bureau Economic Programs
- White House Economic Statistics Briefing Room
February 06, 2006
And The Funds Rate Probabilities Say: 50/50 For Five
Last week I provided a defense of monetary policies that err on the side of being overly aggressive on the inflation watch, using the 1994 rate hikes and their aftermath as a case study. Several people -- Jim Hamilton included -- suggested I might be guilty of a bit of cherry-picking, selectively choosing one of the episodes that worked out well when there are plenty of others that (apparently) worked out less well.
That is fair enough and, as James points out, there will indeed be episodes where I might "regret [policy] tightening as much as it did." But this is somewhat like regretting the purchase of fire insurance because your house didn't burn down -- we might have been better without the insurance after-the-fact, but prudent risk management suggests that betting on that outcome is not the wisest course.
But here's the rub: The policy users guide is missing a few pages in the section describing what constitutes "prudent risk management." In my post I emphasized inflationary pressures. Jim emphasized real economic growth and, not unwisely, continues to worry about driving the spread between long- and short-term rates to levels that are disproportionately associated with economic weakness.
Jim won't be happy with this week's estimated funds rate paths:
Today the ten year Treasury yield closed at 4.54%. I'm pretty sure a 50% chance of another 50 basis points on the funds rate by May is not the sort of caution Professor Hamilton is looking for.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to blogs that reference And The Funds Rate Probabilities Say: 50/50 For Five:
Tracked on Feb 10, 2006 4:59:35 PM
Tracked on Feb 10, 2006 7:47:51 PM
- Payroll Employment Growth: Strong Enough?
- Forecasting Loan Losses for Stress Tests
- Men at Work: Are We Seeing a Turnaround in Male Labor Force Participation?
- What’s Moving the Market’s Views on the Path of Short-Term Rates?
- Lockhart Casts a Line into the Murky Waters of Uncertainty
- How Will Employers Respond to New Overtime Regulations?
- How Good Is The Employment Trend? Decide for Yourself
- Is the Labor Market Tossing a Fair Coin?
- When It Rains, It Pours
- Pay As You Go: Yes or No?
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- Business Cycles
- Business Inflation Expectations
- Capital and Investment
- Capital Markets
- Data Releases
- Economic conditions
- Economic Growth and Development
- Exchange Rates and the Dollar
- Fed Funds Futures
- Federal Debt and Deficits
- Federal Reserve and Monetary Policy
- Financial System
- Fiscal Policy
- Health Care
- Inflation Expectations
- Interest Rates
- Labor Markets
- Latin America/South America
- Monetary Policy
- Money Markets
- Real Estate
- Saving, Capital, and Investment
- Small Business
- Social Security
- This, That, and the Other
- Trade Deficit
- Wage Growth