The Atlanta Fed's macroblog provides commentary and analysis on economic topics including monetary policy, macroeconomic developments, inflation, labor economics, and financial issues.

Authors for macroblog are Dave Altig, John Robertson, and other Atlanta Fed economists and researchers.

« The China Economic Roundup... | Main | A Thoroughly Unscientific Poll On What The FOMC Should Do »

September 07, 2005

The U.S. Economy: The Fundamentals Still Sound?

The latest edition of the Federal Reserve Banks' report on regional economic conditions (the Beige Book) suggests it is so:

Economic activity increased across the nation from mid-July through August, except in the Boston District, where activity was mixed. The growth was widespread as retail sales, services, finance, construction, manufacturing, mining, energy, and tourism all expanded. A few Districts reported softening in residential real estate markets, albeit from still brisk levels of activity, while commercial real estate markets strengthened in most Districts. Lending activity increased, and credit quality was stable. Conditions in the agricultural sector improved slightly, with late summer rains somewhat alleviating the effects of drought. Meanwhile, labor markets showed signs of tightening with modest wage increases. Except for energy, overall consumer price increases were modest.

This is all pre-Katrina, of course, but the first "official" take from the Congressional Budget Office suggests the disaster's effects will be, in Andrew Samwick's words, "significant, but not overwhelming":   

Katrina could dampen real gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the second half of the year by ½ to 1 percentage point and reduce employment through the end of this year by about 400,000. Most economic forecasters had expected 3 percent to 4 percent growth during the second half, and employment growth of 150,000 to 200,000 per month. Economic growth and employment are likely to rebound during the first half of 2006 as rebuilding accelerates.

The effects on the populations and localities that took the direct hit are, of course, enormous, but according to the CBO the spillover effects to the macroeconomy are likely to be limited:

The supply of petroleum products, as indicated above, does not appear to be a major macroeconomic problem, but higher gasoline prices will temporarily reduce both  gasoline consumption and consumption of other goods and services.

As to Brad Setser's fears, the CBO projects:

The damage to the Port of Southern Louisiana is significant, but most shipping will be able to resume in a few weeks or be diverted from the New Orleans facilities to other facilities on the Mississippi (such as Baton Rouge) or to Houston. Vessels drafting more than 39 feet cannot currently use the river. Only one grain elevator appeared to be severely damaged, and the others are coming back into operation as power is restored.

As Andrew points out, these are still only educated guesses at best.  But, as the Beige Book report suggests, the reference point seemed to be an economy on relatively sound footing.  Add to that the fact that the global economy seems to be strengthening more generally, as noted by The Skeptical Speculator, and there is at least some reason for optimism.

I have been feeling a bit gloomy about things in the past week. Maybe some perspective is in order.

September 7, 2005 in Data Releases , Federal Reserve and Monetary Policy , Katrina | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to blogs that reference The U.S. Economy: The Fundamentals Still Sound? :


"I have been feeling a bit gloomy about things in the past week."

Well cheer up, there's no need for that.

"But, as the Beige Book report suggests, the reference point seemed to be an economy on relatively sound footing."

Well this is certainly the impression one gets, a bit lop-sided with the housing boom and the CA deficit, but essentially on an upswing.

As I keep saying Katrina will test the theories. If you emerge relatively unscathed, some people may need to rethink. They may need to, but whether they will is another question.

"the global economy seems to be strengthening more generally"

This is true, but Europe isn't the area I would go for. The data from the UK is mixed, remember manufacturing is a relatively small part of the UK economy now. Services, like in the US, is over 70%. Insurance is of course important (think Katrina).They are just finishing on a very long housing boom. y-o-y house prices are about to turn negative on the dial. Let's wait and see on the UK.

Germany, well you already know what I think. Manufacturing data good, exports up (although the eurozone generally just went into deficit: think oil).Consumption will remain flat (as of course it is in Japan: see Skeptical Speculator), also the possibility of a grand coalition which will be-reform negative (as each party vies for position with the other) just went up.

No, it is in the developing world that you have the sustained growth, and Germany and Japan live from this (and of course the kind efforts of the US consumer).

This forecast from the Asian Development Bank is interesting here:


China and India, they are now the other engines that are pulling the train.

Posted by: Edward Hugh | September 08, 2005 at 02:24 AM

Post a comment

Comments are moderated and will not appear until the moderator has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign in

Google Search

Recent Posts



Powered by TypePad