« The Cost Of Labor Market Regulation | Main | News O' The Day »
March 31, 2005
How Monetary Policy Works
Ben Bernanke gave a very nice tutorial on monetary policy to an education symposium in Ohio yesterday. The material will probably be a bit elementary for veteran students of the Fed, but I think you will find it worthwhile if you are not in that group. At a minimum, it is worth emphasizing (again and again) this often misunderstood point:
The person in the street might tell you that the Fed "controls interest rates." That statement is not literally accurate. In fact, the Fed has little or no direct influence over the interest rates that matter most for the economy, such as mortgage rates, corporate bond rates, or the rates on Treasury securities. Instead, the Fed affects these key rates, as well as the prices of financial assets such as stocks, only indirectly...
The Fed controls very short-term interest rates quite effectively, but the long-term rates that really matter for the economy depend not on the current short-term rate but on the whole trajectory of future short-term rates expected by market participants. Thus, to affect long-term rates, the FOMC must somehow signal to the financial markets its plans for setting future short-term rates.
I would add to that the observation that those trajectories also depend on things quite beyond the control of the central bank -- like real, long-term returns to capital. These are lessons worth remembering as we watch the path interest rates unfold over the immediate future.
March 31, 2005 in Federal Reserve and Monetary Policy | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c834f53ef00d83457b6a669e2
Listed below are links to blogs that reference How Monetary Policy Works:
» Implementing US monetary policy from New Economist
Fed Governor Ben S. Bernanke gave a talk on 30 March to an Ohio symposium on implementing monetary policy. It's not overly technical, and will be particularly useful for people new to the topic. (Hat tip to Macroblog). I'd also recommend the 7 February... [Read More]
Tracked on Apr 1, 2005 7:45:06 AM
Comments
Posted by:
Patrick R. Sullivan |
March 31, 2005 at 06:20 PM
Yes - I strongly agree with that last comment. Academics have spent a long time modelling economies with the price level (or nominal demand) being a function of the money stock. A very convenient modelling device, and one that can be a very useful simplification in the right context. But not terribly realistic, and potentially very misleading in terms of how monetary policy (or the economy) actually works.
It seems still to be far too easy to come out of an economics degree having been taught that governments control the money supply, that money is neutral in the long run, and that monetarism was basically 'right' except for some inconvenient short term market frictions that go away if you wait long enough. Never mind the non-constant velocity of money, the fact that governments set rates not the money supply, and that monetary booms and busts have very real effects.
More power to those who tell us how it really works. Nice site, by the way.
Posted by:
rjw |
April 14, 2005 at 06:51 PM


I wouldn't be so sure that this information is understood all that well. I've had several people with graduate degrees in economics deny this mechanism to be 'Monetarism in drag':
"The manager of the Open Market Desk and his team bear the responsibility of adjusting the supply of fed funds to maintain the funds rate at or near the target established by the FOMC."